dukat's de occupatione baiorana


Okay wait, now I’m thinking of Cardassian Prefect/Roman Provincial Governor parallels.

An interesting version would be Gul Dukat as Verres of Cicero’s In Verrem (tl;dr: super blantantly corrupt gov of Sicily on whom Cicero absolutely went to town in the prosecution speech that put him on the oratorical/political map).

But I could also see Gul Dukat as Caesar. Obviously Caesar was much more successful, but in terms of the occupation/colonization, there are similar themes of genocide and enslavement, not to mention cultural genocide. That’s the morally repugnant part; the cursed part would be that Dukat would absolutely write a Commentary on the Gallic War Bajoran Occupation (Commentarii de Occupatione Baiorana?).

For those who haven't read the Commentary on the Gallic War (Commentarii de Bello Gallico, unaffectionately known to the last decade of AP Latin students as DBG), it's Caesar's account of the Roman conquest of Gaul, written in chunks and sent back to Rome as basically a PR effort[1] as he was waging war on the Gallic tribes.

It features:

So yeah. That, but Dukat.

(And when I say “the weirdest possible description of Germany” I was specifically thinking about this bit:

There are also animals called elks. Their shape and dappled coat are like those of goats, but they are rather larger, have stunted horns, and legs without joints. They do not lie down to sleep: if they are struck by some unexpected misfortune and fall down, they cannot raise themselves or get up again. They use trees as couches, leaning against them to secure a modicum of repose and so taking their rest.

—DBG 6.27, trans. Carolyn Hammond (emphasis mine)

Tell me you can’t imagine Dukat spewing similar nonsense about some random Bajoran animal.)


  1. FTR, both war and PR efforts were successful. Caesar's time as governor of Gaul was what gave him the funds, popularity, and military support to seize control of the Roman government.^